Somehow, it has become common practice in this country for women to wear leggings as pants. A curious phenomenon to gain such wide acceptance, for sure. Are leggings not merely opaque hosiery? Appropriate underneath a skirt or capris, certainly. But not under a long shirt or sweater. And certainly not under a short shirt or sweater. Why?
Because. Leggings are not pants. They’re so not pants, it’s appropriate to call then “notpants”.
I can make an extensive list of things that aren’t pants. Sweaters aren’t pants. Jackets aren’t pants. Shoes? Not pants in the slightest. But at the top of that list, the unequivocal champion of all things that are not pants has got to be leggings. And no matter what Gap and Target try to tell you, Jeggings are second place in the race for notpants supremacy. I don’t care if your denim long underwear has belt loops and pockets, you can’t just strut around wearing them as pants.
My stance on the subject is well known. So well know that I got called out on The Social Network last week when I announced that my daughter was running around the park wearing a pink gymnastics unitard (complete with built-in shorts), leggings as pants (over the unitard), red Columbia fleece, pink socks and ruby red slippers. But two layers of notpants does not pants make, and one of my most staunch anti-notpants allies was quick to point out my hypocrisy.
-
Nikki D.: Oh snap. She’s one of “those” leggings as pants wearers? I didn’t see it coming….(18 April at 20:13 )
-
Me: We have a special dispensation in this house that allows kids under 8 to wear notpants. But when she’s old enough to understand, we’ll certainly have a chat with her about how leggings are not pants. (18 April at 20:24 )
-
Nikki D.: Start the conditioning now. Its like the DARE program for children in elementary school…cut them off before they know what drugs are. I’m sure you would be supported to start the notpants program in the schools. (18 April at 20:29)
Nikki has a point. But my wife thinks that little girls in leggings are really cute, even if she agrees with me that any woman who sported the leggings was not worthy of The Manny’s affection*. So we shall pose the question to the masses. Is it appropriate to have a leggings as pants dispensation for kids, or should we hold a strong line and not contribute to the systematic desensitization of notpants in our culture?
*True story, bro. When The Manny was being The Manny, he would sometimes go on dates. First question we’d ask was what he thought of the lady. Second question? Pants or notpants? A “notpants” answer earned the gong faster than a prolific belcher. We wouldn’t let The Manny settle for just anyone, you know.
Renew and Restore


















